Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sibusiso Mchunu's avatar

A few thoughts

I will deal with some of the claims made in the article as I felt that they were significant issues within it.

The argument that the Gazan health ministry has been “conveying false information” is tenuous at best. Firstly, the numbers coming out the UN doesn’t mean the casualties didn’t occur but rather that they didn’t have the positive identification for those victims yet. The same Gaza health ministry you insinuate for conveying false information has previously had numbers which concurred with estimates coming from independent NGO’s as well as Israeli’s internal estimates. This is ignoring the fact that even the State Department has deemed the numbers reliable, in fact when President Biden placed doubt on the numbers earlier on in the conflict, the ministry released a detailed list of casualties with ID numbers and other biographical information as proof of their numbers.

On a sidenote your assertion that Hamas are “are a bunch of lying, evil pieces of shit who have no regard for truth or human life” is more of an emotional argument and it is particularly intriguing that you don’t subject Israel to the same critique given their lies during the conflict and before then.

Take as an example the AL-Ahli hospital which you mentioned as an example of Hamas lies, you neglected to mention that the evidence that Israel gave attributing the attack to PIJ was later debunked as not corresponding to the known facts of what happened or the fact that initially some within Israel claimed responsibility. The attack followed the same pattern as the murder of Shireen Abu Akleh a Palestinian-American journalist who Israel initially claimed had been murdered by militants but changed its story after some backlash and evidence to the contrary till it ultimately claimed that the IDF might have been responsible for her death and promised an investigation (which is still pending).

Another claim you make which in my opinion is all the more puzzling is that Israel has done all it can to prevent civilian deaths when we see how Israel has been using dumb bombs instead of precision bombs during its attacks (one member of the Knesset recently even threatened to intensify this due to Biden temporarily withholding large payload bombs to Israel) as well as two separate investigative articles published by 972 magazine which revealed the extent to which AI had been used as part of Israel’s bombing campaign and illustrated how Israel purposefully targeted militants when they were at home for maximum damage (‘where’s daddy’). The reports also showed how Israel would target an area populated with civilians knowingly despite either the lack of military targets or a widely disproportionate militant to civilian ratio. This is to say nothing of the destruction of civilian infrastructure and the fact that Israeli soldiers were on the record stating that they are “no innocents” in Gaza.

Another claim you make is the debunked “Human Shields” argument or the claim that Hamas is one that has been refuted prior to October 7th and since, in fact there has been several documented cases (including one video shot by a captured Israeli drone) of Israeli using Palestinian civilians as human shields.

Your assertion that Hamas is some sort of death cult which preys on western sensibilities is quite frankly detached from reality, they are not the first to make use of the term martyr and don’t go out of their way to kill their people to gain said martyrs. The supposed military base argument is one that Israel has yet to substantiate to this day and even the BBC had to point out some inconsistencies with Israeli claims.

On the topic of al-Shifa there has been the discovery of more than one mass grave there in the aftermath of the Israeli incursion there with evidence suggesting people were executed on the spot, Israel as also destroyed other hospitals in Gaza without providing a smidge of proof that there was any militant activity there.

To conclude, I find it quite disheartening that a substack such as yours which seeks prioritise data over dogma has ended up producing an article stuffed full of debunked claims, emotional and substantiated arguments (of the variety you would readily call out gender idealogues for) and an overlooking of an overwhelming amount of data and research which belie your claim all pint to your prioritisation over pro-Israeli dogma instead of a carefully researched commentary on the facts.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts